Dyson Clean+Wash Hygiene vs WashG1: Which is better for cleaning a small home?

As someone in my 30s, my homeownership journey has been marked by Dyson product drops.

The Dyson V12s Detect Slim Submarine launched just as I moved into my first solo apartment. I had been renting for a while, but this time, I was fully responsible for the space — including cleaning it. Being the main tenant meant no alternating chore schedules to share the load.

Next came the Dyson Wash G1 — my first “big girl” mop and wet vacuum. 

Now, the arrival of the Dyson Clean+Wash Hygiene marks yet another milestone: purchasing my first home. With the purchase of my modest three-room HDB, I’m officially a homeowner (well, for about 60 years before returning it to the government)!

While homeownership is a major life milestone, you quickly realise the responsibilities and mental load that come with managing a home. Renting came with similar duties, but now I’m fully accountable for the upkeep. There’s no landlord to call, no one to defer responsibility to. And unlike a rental, this isn’t something I’ll hand back after two years. And if I ever intend to

Dyson Clean+Wash Hygiene vs WashG1: What’s the difference?

Compared to its predecessor, the DysonClean+Wash Hygiene weighs just 3.82kg, versus the WashG1 at 4.9kg. In comparison to other models on the market, Roborock’s wet vacuums weigh around 4.2 - 6.2kg, with some Xiaomi models going up to 11kg.

1.1kg might not sound like much, but anyone who’s spent time at the gym — or cleaning an entire home — knows that quickly adds up.

My three-room HDB is about 80sqm, which means mopping the entire space takes around 30 minutes. The Clean+Wash Hygiene delivers up to 70 minutes of runtime, though using Max mode will require more frequent refills. The lighter build also means a smaller, lighter water tank.

My home also features four different types of tiled flooring, including uneven surfaces in the living room. With its predecessor, the combination of weight and uneven flooring made cleaning quite a chore. I’d be sweating and exhausted by the end of each clean.

With the Dyson Clean+Wash Hygiene, however, I was pleasantly surprised. The reduced weight makes cleaning feel more like a quick chore rather than an added workout. The real test was tackling uneven flooring — and thanks to the improved single-roller design (instead of two) and lighter build, cleaning just felt much more manageable.

A more hygienic, filter-free cleaning system

“Clean+Wash Hygiene” might seem like an odd name for a mop, but it quickly makes sense in use.

The filter-free system cleans both wet and dry dirt without relying on a traditional filter — meaning no trapped bacteria or unpleasant odours being expelled. The motorised brush bar also separates waste efficiently into a dirty water tank and debris tray, making the cleaning process far more hygienic and fuss-free.

I particularly liked that all waste is collected at the bottom, so there’s no sludge being drawn upwards. In comparison, I found the WashG1’s tank system somewhat cumbersome — both tanks looked identical, and I often had to double-check I was using the right one. This redesign is a welcome improvement.

The upgraded hot self-cleaning cycle (and why it matters)

“Clean+Wash Hygiene” might seem like an odd name for a mop, but it quickly makes sense in use.

The filter-free system cleans both wet and dry dirt without relying on a traditional filter — meaning no trapped bacteria or unpleasant odours being expelled. The motorised brush bar also separates waste efficiently into a dirty water tank and debris tray, making the cleaning process far more hygienic and fuss-free.

I particularly liked that all waste is collected at the bottom, so there’s no sludge being drawn upwards. In comparison, I found the WashG1’s tank system somewhat cumbersome — both tanks looked identical, and I often had to double-check I was using the right one. This redesign is a welcome improvement.

Limitations: Where the Dyson Clean+Wash Hygiene falls short

Of course, no machine is perfect.

For my monthly deep cleans, I usually hire a cleaner, and every single one of them has baulked at the machine. Understandably so. The rectangular head makes it difficult to reach tight corners, edges, and nooks. You’ll still need a manual mop for those areas.

For tougher stains like oil, I found myself needing to go over the same spot multiple times, letting it dry in between passes before the sticky residue fully disappeared. I also struggled with stubborn streaking at times. I often had to run Boost mode several times, which drains the clean water tank quite quickly.

Is the Dyson Clean+Wash Hygiene worth its $729 price tag?

If you’re already a Dyson fan living in a modest-sized apartment and prefer to handle your own cleaning, the Clean+Wash is a worthwhile upgrade. The lighter weight and smoother handling on tiled floors make a noticeable difference, and I’ve found myself doing lighter, more frequent cleans between deep-clean sessions.

Cleaning the machine itself is also much more convenient, which makes regular use feel less like a chore and more like a habit.

As a solo homeowner who prefers cleaning in smaller, manageable bursts, this machine has been a lifesaver — but I wouldn’t be throwing out my manual mop just yet.

For larger households, especially those with young children or pets, the investment may be harder to justify. You’ll likely still need additional tools to maintain a truly deep clean.

While it’s far easier to use than the V12 Submarine or WashG1, if you’re particularly meticulous about cleanliness, I’d still recommend vacuuming first — and holding onto your trusty spin mop.