In the 2016 rom-com How to Be Single, Alice Kepley (played by Dakota Johnson) mused, “The time we have to be single, is really the time we have to get good at being alone. But how good at being alone do we really want to be? Isn’t there a danger that you’ll get so good at being single, so set in your ways that you’ll miss out on the chance to be with somebody great?”
I won’t lie. That moment hit me hard.
I’m an incorrigible first-dater who hasn’t gone on a second date for more than a year. Crushes? Sure, I’ve had a fair amount over the years. And I’ve had no shortage of suitors. But at 29, I have never had a boyfriend or experienced falling in love.
So the movie triggered several questions that I wasn’t comfortable answering. Was I really becoming too good at being single? Was I afraid of committing to a relationship? Was I short-changing myself by not venturing out and taking a chance on someone – anyone?
And, more importantly, was I just running away from the overwhelming fear of letting someone into my bubble, laying out all my flaws and vulnerabilities for them to judge?
Is there really a soulmate for everyone?
The notion of soulmates presupposes that there is someone for everyone. It’s a romantic ideal: there aren’t plenty of fish in the sea, but truly, one perfect fish person out there waiting for our bait.
And it’s an ideal I had bought into. I would embark on a date expecting to meet my soulmate, believing that all I needed to do was look harder, sit through more insipid dates, before finally meeting a Mr Right on my final, momentous, fateful first date.
But to arrive at that point, I needed to first figure out what that Mr Right looked like, what he embodied, and why, exactly, he was right for me.
My criteria were arbitrary – I went for the “vibe” instead of anything concrete, which often led me to create my own illusions of the guy instead of getting to know what was right in front of me. Not the best way to meet my soulmate, I realised.
“To be soulmates with someone, you need to first bare your soul,” said another friend of mine who married her childhood sweetheart.
It sounded simple in theory. In practice? Not so much, at least for me, a walking bag of neuroses and anxiety who finds the idea of opening up to anyone terrifying.
It always boggled me how couples realised they were made for each other. How could they be so certain? How did two souls grow close enough to become a part of each other? For someone who could barely get a second date, finding my soulmate seemed more like a myth than a goal.
Comfortable being alone or lonely being comfortable?
But it soon started to seem like a convenient excuse to hide from that pressure of not living up to someone’s expectations, of creating that spark with a near stranger.
“You’re pretty and smart and nice,” more than one friend has remarked. “Why is it that you’ve always been single?”
Maybe I could be a catch. But a university degree, photogenic looks, and a figure toned from swimming and yoga weren’t enough to sustain a connection beyond three dates, tops. It felt easier to be alone. Solitude was good. Solitude was simple. Uncomplicated. If I didn’t care about someone else, I wouldn’t have to put myself in a position where I could get hurt.
And, according to a particularly astute friend of mine, I am “the sort who would always get hurt in a relationship”.
“You’re too non-confrontational. That’s not how a good relationship works,” she said.
She was on to something there. As a conflict-avoidant Libra, I cared too much, hurt easily, swallowed my pain and pretended everything was fine. I didn’t like upsetting people, even if it meant I had to put aside my feelings just to make them happy. An offhand, negative remark from them could send me spiralling into anxiety, wondering if I did something to displease them.
It was just easier to not get involved with anyone at all, if only to spare myself the inevitable angst and frustration that came with the cotton candy moments.
So I had always kept people at arm’s length, coasting by on first dates (and the odd second or third) and then parting ways just before things got serious or complicated. A well-guarded heart cannot be hurt, after all.
In the 2009 rom-com, The Proposal, Margaret Tate (played by Sandra Bullock) declared, “There’s a reason I’ve been alone all this time. I’m comfortable that way.”
And I was relieved. Someone – albeit fictional – felt the same way as I did. My singlehood was validated. Really, it was because we chose to be that way, not because we were afraid of being with someone.
The myth of the meet-cute
I wasn’t always this cynical though. Throughout my formative years, I had watched rom-com after rom-com, imagining similar ideal scenarios where I would meet my soulmate – in a bookstore, where we reached for the same book, or a concert, where we happened to sit next to each other, or even an office party, which was where a close friend of mine met her boyfriend.
But as I went on date after date (although even those slowed as I entered my late 20s), reality bit. There was no insta-spark triggered between bouts of witty banter, no defining moment of connection between two souls – just the same awkward dance of civility and guarded interest as we volleyed safe, banal topics back and forth.
And while several of those dates played out pleasantly enough, one – or sometimes both – of us would eventually decide that a second date wasn’t worth the time and effort. After all, in this age of swiping and ghosting, forging and cutting off a temporary dalliance required minimal effort. Why remain stuck on one less-than-ideal candidate?
Not to say that I’ve never had any second or third dates. There were several guys in the course of my dating life whom I had decided to take a bigger chance on. But something always niggled at the back of my mind and made me give up the connection in the end: he was low-key rude to the wait staff; he talked too much about politics and finance; or he was flippant about his family or avoided certain questions about them (Spidey senses tingling…)
And yet we plod on…
As I approach the big three-o, I can’t help but wonder if this is it. Am I doomed to a lifetime of first dates that peter out and connections that go nowhere? Is there something inherently wrong with me that I can only make it as far as one date?
For reals, first dates are daunting, exciting and even anxiety-inducing. It’s a heap of misguided expectations and optimism dog-piled on one another, resulting in eventual disillusionment with the romantic fantasy.
And if I wanted a shot at finding my someone, I needed to sit through not only the discomfort of a first date, but also the fear of opening up to someone and letting him in, of potential conflict along the way that was part and parcel of any healthy relationship.
Will I ever advance further than one meetup? Will those attempts lead to a Happily Ever After? Only the next date will tell.
New dating lingo to know if you’re looking for love in 2019
Benching: Benching is when you string someone along so that you don’t have to commit to dating them officially, and they keep waiting on the side-lines for you instead of moving on. The one being benched, called the benchwarmer (yes, like in a basketball game), is basically someone’s Plan B while they shop around for a better option.
Tindstagramming: A combination of Tinder and Instagram, Tindstagramming is direct-messaging someone through Instagram after you come across them on Tinder but not become a match. To avoid being Tindstagrammed, don’t link your Instagram account to your Tinder profile.
Expe-dating: This is when you ask to meet up with someone you’ve been talking to on a dating app way too soon, i.e. expedite the dating process, usually to your detriment.
Breadcrumbing: Like how you would lay a trail of breadcrumbs to get little creatures to follow you, breadcrumbing is when you keep sending flirty messages to someone although you’re not interested in dating them but don’t wish to cut them off completely.
Phubbing: Basically, phone snubbing. Phubbing is when your date pays excessive attention to their phone instead of you, deliberately or otherwise implying that their phone is their priority, not you.