Diana, a biopic of the late princess of Wales, who died in a Paris car crash, was set for its world premiere on Thursday with its star Naomi Watts already defending her involvement in the controversial film.
The movie follows Diana’s romance with London-based Pakistani surgeon Hasnat Khan, whom many friends of the princess say was her real love and the man she allegedly called “Mr Wonderful”.
Based on Kate Snell’s 2001 book Diana: Her Last Love, the film suggests that Diana started dating Dodi Fayed to make Khan jealous — a claim challenged by many close to the princess.
Diana died with Fayed when the Mercedes in which they were travelling slammed into a pillar in a Paris road tunnel in 1997 while being pursued by press photographers.
Ahead of the premiere in London’s Leicester Square, Watts, a British-Australian actress who came to prominence in Mulholland Drive in 2001, admitted that she was taking a risk by accepting the role of the “People’s Princess”.
She was asked if she felt the film would offend Diana’s sons, Princes William and Harry.
“Hopefully, if they get to see the film, they will feel that we have done it in a respectful and sensitive way,” she told BBC TV.
“We try to honour the depiction of her character in the best possible way.”
But on Wednesday, Watts stormed out of a separate interview with BBC radio, apparently because a question offended her.
The surprised presenter, Simon Mayo, tweeted: “A first for me… as Naomi Watts walked out of an interview! She seemed a tad uncomfortable with the questions. Shame.”
The film has been officially ignored by the royal family although its producer Robert Bernstein claims the royals gave some help in allowing filming in Kensington Gardens, where Diana would go jogging.
Some critics have noted that Watts bears little physical resemblance to Diana, and had to wear a prosthetic nose for the film.
She is the only established movie star in the film — Khan is played by British-Indian actor Naveen Andrews, best known for his role in the TV series Lost.
Watts claimed in an earlier interview that she “found herself constantly asking for (Diana’s) permission to carry on” in the film, which is directed by Oliver Hirschbiegel.
“I felt like I was spending a lot of time with her. There was one particular moment when I felt her permission was granted,” Watts told the Mail on Sunday, before adding: “That won’t sound right in print, I know.”
Khan, who still works in Britain, said he did not intend to see the film.
As if on cue ahead of its release, new conspiracy theories about Diana’s death have begun circulating after police revealed they were investigating claims that a member of Britain’s special forces was involved.
Scotland Yard said in August that detectives were checking the “relevance and credibility” of information they had received.
Reports said the claims came from the estranged parents-in-law of a member of the elite SAS. The soldier in question gave evidence at the trial of a former colleague who was found guilty of possessing weapons illegally.
Official investigations into Diana’s death have concluded that the chauffeur of the Mercedes, Frenchman Henri Paul, was driving under the effects of alcohol at the time he ferried the couple from the Ritz Hotel across Paris.
Film depictions of the British royals have traditionally received a distinctly mixed critical reception.
The King’s Speech starring Colin Firth and The Queen with Helen Mirren as the monarch were garlanded with awards.
But a 2011 made-for-TV movie about the romance between William and the-then Kate Middleton was described by the Daily Mail as “truly terrible” and “shoddily cast, poorly executed, and badly edited”. – AFP RELAXNEWS